Lack of Super Horse Underscores Triple Crown

Two elements have underscored the first two Triple Crown races: pace and the absence of a super horse. What’s in store for the Belmont Stakes on June 10?

Parity is clarity.

Thoroughbred horse racing’s Triple Crown series underscores two points we’ve harped on in this blog: the elements of pace and the absence of a super horse.

Cloud Computing’s rallying Preakness Stakes victory over Classic Empire would normally be rare. A horse well-positioned in the final turn of that race rarely yields a three-length lead. But, Classic Empire was spent from a head-knocking speed duel with Always Dreaming, the Kentucky Derby winner, and was nipped near the wire.

Apparently taking their cue from past Preakness events, in which speed horses have performed well, jockeys on heavily-favored Always Dreaming and Classic Empire placed them in front of the field to set up a two-horse stretch duel. But the strategy backfired. The horses fought each other at each step rather than simply running a fast time, setting the stage for 13-1 shot Cloud Computing. The fact that this became the first horse to skip the Derby and win the Preakness since 2009 (Rachel Alexandra) won’t be lost on the industry. Cloud Computing had the freshest legs down the stretch, overcoming a horse who had run just two weeks prior. An owner who believes his or her horse can make just one good effort in the Triple Crown series may also skip the Derby. (The Belmont Stakes, completing the trilogy, is June 10).

Anyone cashing the Preakness’ $1 trifecta for $1,097 richly deserves it because that payout reflects the Derby winner running completely out of the money and Senior Investment, at 30-1, storming up to nab third. The same goes for the superfecta returning more than $8,000, completed by Lookin At Lee.

Always Dreaming finished eighth in the Preakness, the first time a Derby winner flopped so badly since Super Saver in 2010. But that’s what’s possible with a competitive, non-exceptional field.

 

Baseball Bad Beats

Bad Beat Hangover, as I’d call it, has been a true pattern in recent weeks. The Baltimore Orioles blow a two-run lead in the bottom of the ninth and lose to the Washington Nationals. What follows? They lose three straight games to the Kansas City Royals. The Chicago White Sox go ahead of the California Angles in extra innings only to cough up the lead and lose. What follows? They drop the next two games.

The St. Louis Cardinals squander a 4-0 lead to the Boston Red Sox and lose in 13 innings. They follow by blowing a ninth-inning lead and the game, and drop a third-straight contest in 13 innings.

If a team has been burned one night, especially an average team, think about going against them the next day if the line is right. Another item for consideration: the rarity of a three-game series sweep. They happen from time to time, but going against that trend is generally your friend.

Take a look last weekend. The Cardinals, Angels, Blue Jays, Nationals, Yankees, Padres and Red Sox all won to avert the broom. The Houston Astros lost. Teams facing a possible series sweep were 6-1. That’s some run from under the gun.

Recent Articles

History Playbook

On This Day In Sports History

On May 11, 1996, a celebration for John Franco at Shea Stadium turned into a 16-minute brawl as the Mets edged the Cubs 7-6. The fight ignited after Mets pitcher Pete Harnisch threw a punch at catcher Scott Servais, leading to nine ejections, including a bloodied Franco. Despite the chaos, the Mets secured the win on a dramatic walk-off home run by Rico Brogna.

On This Day In Sports History

On May 10, 1999, Nomar Garciaparra delivered a historic performance at Fenway Park, hitting three home runs and driving in 10 runs during a 12-4 Red Sox victory over the Mariners. Garciaparra’s power display included two grand slams and a two-run shot, making him only the 11th player in MLB history to hit two grand slams in a single game.