Tennis Anyone?: How To Make Winning French Open Bets

There aren’t any great U.S. tennis players anymore so how can American-based bettors find an edge without really paying attention? Here are some French Open betting suggestions.

It’s been years since John McEnroe, Jimmy Connors, Andre Agassi, or even Pete Sampras have ruled the tennis courts. U.S. men’s tennis has been absent for the past two decades.

Ever hear of Taylor Fritz or Tommy Paul? Probably not.

The women’s division has more hope for the U.S. You’ve probably heard of Coco Gauff, a worthy successor to the dominant Williams sisters, Serena and Vanessa. But how about Madison Keys? Maybe not.

So, if you have even a passing interest in tennis and a patriotic betting philosophy, who do you get behind? It’s not an easy equation, given the emergence of some new tennis superstars, none of whom hail from the United States.

 

 

But let’s not forget, the French Open is probably the most unique matchup of all the tennis majors. It takes an expert at the clay courts to win. Roland Garros is the only major that has these tricky courts, and when you slide to hit a passing shot, you might trip. Who knows? That’s what makes the French Open special.

Man Up

So let’s start with the men’s division.

Sorry if the memory of great U.S. players clouds your memory, but Fritz and Paul come in at +10000 and +25000, respectively, to win the tournament. They’re not sexy, they’re not up and coming, and they’re not likely to win.

So, where do you go? The defending champion? Makes a lot of sense since the defending champion has shown a proclivity to conquer the clay multiple times. Rafael Nadal won the French Open four straight times twice, from 2005-2008 and again from 2017-2020. But he was a prodigy.

So, can Carlos Alcaraz do it even twice? To be sure, he is the favorite at +100. But that’s not likely to get you excited, so what are some of the better tips?

 

 

Defending U.S. Open and two-time Australian Open winner Jannik Sinner comes in at +200, while three-time French Open champion Novak Djokovic is +1300. But Djokovic is having an abysmal year, failing to win even one tournament, and has recently changed coaches. Not very inspiring.

Alexander Zverev (+1700) was runner-up to Alcaraz last year and even led in sets 2-1 before falling behind.

But most experts predict an Alcaraz-Skinner final since they are the top two players in the world and are experienced on the clay courts.

Ladies First

On the distaff side, the favorite surprisingly isn’t last year’s winner, Iga Swiatek, who has won at Roland Garros four times. She’s played poorly this year and her odds have reflected that at +340 to win. The favorite is Aryna Sabalenka at +260.

 

 

Those two are followed by Coco Gauff (+500), Mirra Andreeva (+550) and Jasmine Paolini (+1400), who was absolutely trounced in last year’s final 6-2 and 6-1, but has had an encouraging year so far. She won the Italian Open earlier this month taking down Gauff 6-4 and 6-2.

Latvian Jeļena Ostapenko won the French Open in 2017 as a 20-year-old and she’s having a great year, including a win on clay when she won the Stuttgart Open in April, defeating the top two seeds Świątek and Sabalenka en route to the title. She’s got a nice number at +3300.

American Madison Keys is +4200 and worth a few bucks since she won this year’s first major, the Australian Open.

 


 

21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER

 


 

Recent Articles

History Playbook

On This Day In Sports History

On July 3, 1966, Atlanta Braves pitcher Tony Cloninger made MLB history by hitting two grand slams in a 17-3 rout of the San Francisco Giants at Candlestick Park. Driving in nine runs—a single-game record for a pitcher—Cloninger remains the only pitcher in major league history to hit two grand slams in a single game, or even an entire career.

On This Day In Sports History

On July 3, 2009, John Kane triggered five video poker jackpots in under an hour at Vegas's Silverton Casino. The secret? A hyper-specific software glitch that let him replay winning hands at max stakes just by pressing a precise sequence of buttons. The feds charged Kane and his partner under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, but a judge dismissed the case. The ruling? Simply pushing the buttons a casino provides to the public—even in a glitchy order—isn't hacking. The exploit forced IGT to rush out global firmware patches, cementing it as one of the wilder legal loopholes in modern gaming history.